Vol. 2 No. 1 (2026)
Articles

The State of Art on the Impact of University Education on the Social Economy and Social Entrepreneurship

pdf
  • Cristina Bonet-Segura,
  • Domingo Ribeiro-Soriano,
  • Alessandro Zardini
Cristina Bonet-Segura
Universitat de València
Domingo Ribeiro-Soriano
Universitat de València
Alessandro Zardini
University of Pavia

Published 2026-05-30

Keywords

  • “University education”, “Social economy”, “Social entrepreneurship”, “Educational innovation”, “Multi-sectoral collaboration”, “digitalisation”.

How to Cite

Bonet-Segura, C., Ribeiro-Soriano, D., & Zardini, A. (2026). The State of Art on the Impact of University Education on the Social Economy and Social Entrepreneurship. JOINETECH, 2(1), 69-82. https://doi.org/10.65479/joinetech.34

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Copyright (c) 2026 JOINETECH provides immediate free access to its content, with the conviction that making this information available to the public favors a greater global knowledge exchange. In this sense, the journal follows the DOAJ definition of open access: "We define them as journals in which the copyright holder of a scholarly work grants the rights of use to others using an open licence (Creative Commons or equivalent) that allows immediate free access to the work and permits any user to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search or link to the full text of articles, crawl them for indexing, pass them as data to software or use them for any other lawful purpose. JOINETECH adheres to different initiatives that promote free access to knowledge, such as Plan S of the cOAlition S, or the principles of the communication infrastructure for academic publication and open science AmeliCA, so all JOINETECH contents edited by UTAMED are from free and open access and are published under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0). Likewise, the journal provides information on the conditions of use and reuse of content (Creative Commons and Open Access). That is why the authors who publish in JOINETECH must accept the following conditions: - The authors retain the copyright, assigning to JOINETECH the right of the 1st publication, with the work registered with the Creative Commons attribution license (which allows third parties to use what is published as long as they mention the authorship of the work and the 1st publication in this journal). - Authors can make other independent and additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in JOINETECH (eg, publish it in a book or in an institutional repository) provided that it is clearly indicated that the work was published for the first time in JOINETECH. - Authors are allowed, and even recommended, to publish their work on the Internet (institutional, personal pages, social networks, etc.) since it can facilitate exchanges. - Authors are allowed, and even encouraged, to deposit supplementary material, at least the research data underlying publications, in institutional or thematic open access repositories federated in the European Open Science Cloud (EOSC)."

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Abstract

This study explores the intersection between university education, the social economy, and social entrepreneurship by conducting a systematic analysis of international academic production. Using quantitative and network analysis techniques, the research identifies trends, influential authors, prominent journals, and emerging thematic clusters in the field. The results highlight the growing importance of social entrepreneurship education, particularly from the second decade of the 21st century onwards, and underline the strategic role of universities in developing ethical, technical, and social competencies aimed at social transformation. Educational innovation, digitalisation, and cross-sector collaboration emerge as key factors in enhancing training practices and aligning academic programs with the complex demands of contemporary society. The study offers a comprehensive and updated overview of the academic landscape, supporting the identification of new opportunities for collaboration and future research.

Recent studies also highlight the growing incorporation of digital and AI-based tools in university training, suggesting that emerging technologies may further enhance innovation, collaboration, and the social impact of higher education.

pdf

References

  1. Apetrei, A., Ribeiro, D., Roig, S., & Tur, A. M. (2013). El emprendedor social: una explicación intercultural. CIRIEC-España, Revista de Economía Pública, Social y Cooperativa, (78), 37-52.
  2. Ball, R., & Tunger, D. (2006). Bibliometric analysis—A new business area for information professionals in libraries? Support for scientific research by perception and trend analysis. Scientometrics, 66(3), 561-577. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-006-0041-0
  3. Battilana, J., & Lee, M. (2014). Advancing research on hybrid organizing—Insights from the study of social enterprises. Academy of Management Annals, 8(1), 397-441. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520.2014.893615
  4. Boyack, K. W., & Klavans, R. (2010). Co-citation analysis, bibliographic coupling, and direct citation: Which citation approach represents the research front most accurately? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(12), 2389-2404. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21419
  5. Bretos, I., Díaz-Foncea, M., & Marcuello, C. (2023). Economía social, estudios críticos de gestión y universidad: Un estudio de caso del Laboratorio de Economía Social (LABES). CIRIEC-España, Revista de Economía Pública, Social y Cooperativa, 109, 31-61. https://doi.org/10.7203/CIRIEC-E.109.22979
  6. Callon, M., Courtial, J. P., Turner, W. A., & Bauin, S. (1983). From translations to problematic networks: An introduction to co-word analysis. Social Science Information, 22(2), 191-235. https://doi.org/10.1177/053901883022002003
  7. Catala, A., Savall, T., & Chaves-Avila, R. (2023). From entrepreneurial and innovation ecosystems to the social economy ecosystem. Journal of Business Research, 163, 113932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113932
  8. Dacin, M. T., Dacin, P. A., & Tracey, P. (2011). Social entrepreneurship: A critique and future directions. Organization Science, 22(5), 1203-1213. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0620
  9. Defourny, J., & Nyssens, M. (2010). Conceptions of social enterprise and social entrepreneurship in Europe and the United States: Convergences and divergences. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 1(1), 32-53. https://doi.org/10.1080/19420670903442053
  10. Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., & Nacke, L. (2011). From game design elements to gamefulness: Defining “gamification”. Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference, 9–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/2181037.2181040
  11. Dwivedi, Y. K., & Al-Banna, H. (2025). Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) for Sustainability: An Exploration of Emerging Academic Discourses. JOINETECH (International Journal of Economic and Technological Studies), 11(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.65479/joinetech.14
  12. Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
  13. Doherty, B. (2014). Social enterprises as hybrid organizations: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 16(4), 417-436. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12028
  14. Elmuti, D., Khoury, G., & Omran, O. (2012). Does entrepreneurship education have a role in developing entrepreneurial skills and ventures’ effectiveness? Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 15, 83-98.
  15. Enos, S. (2015). Service-learning and social entrepreneurship in higher education: A pedagogy of social change. Basingstoke, Reino Unido: Palgrave Macmillan.
  16. Fayolle, A., & Gailly, B. (2015). The impact of entrepreneurship education on entrepreneurial attitudes and intention: Hysteresis and persistence. Journal of Small Business Management, 53(1), 75-93. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12065
  17. Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(2), 95–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.02.001
  18. Gaviria-Marin, M., Merigo, J. M., & Popa, S. (2018). Twenty years of the Journal of Knowledge Management: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Knowledge Management, 22(8), 1655-1687. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-10-2017-0497
  19. Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., & Hamilton, A. L. (2013). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 15-31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428112452151
  20. Hlady-Rispal, M., & Servantie, V. (2018). Deconstructing the way in which value is created in the context of social entrepreneurship. International Journal of Management Reviews, 20(1), 62-80. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12113
  21. Jones, P., & Iredale, N. (2010). Enterprise education as pedagogy. Education + Training, 52(1), 7-19. https://doi.org/10.1108/00400911011017654
  22. Kessler, M. M. (1963). Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. American Documentation, 14(1), 10-25. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.5090140103
  23. Kraus, S., Breier, M., & Dasí-Rodríguez, S. (2020). The art of crafting a systematic literature review in entrepreneurship research. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 16(3), 1023-1042. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-020-00635-4
  24. Le Ber, M. J., & Branzei, O. (2010). The dark triangle: Hybridization in the third sector. En Dialogues in Critical Management Studies (Vol. 1, pp. 263-293). Emerald Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2046-6072(2011)0000001027
  25. Lévesque, B., & Mendell, M. (1999). L’économie sociale au Québec: Éléments théoriques et empiriques pour le débat et la recherche. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 70(4), 579-594. https://doi.org/10.7202/005149ar
  26. Lozano, R., Ceulemans, K., Alonso-Almeida, M., Huisingh, D., Lozano, F. J., Waas, T., Lambrechts, W., Lukman, R., & Hugé, J. (2015). Declarations for sustainability in higher education: Becoming better leaders, through addressing the university system. Journal of Cleaner Production, 48, 10–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.10.006
  27. Mair, J., & Martí, I. (2006). Social entrepreneurship research: A source of explanation, prediction, and delight. Journal of World Business, 41(1), 36-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2005.09.002
  28. Monzón, J.L. & Chaves, R. (2012). The Social Economy in the European Union, European Economic and Social Committee of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2864/19534
  29. Mueller, S., Brahm, T., & Neck, H. (2015). Service learning in social entrepreneurship education: Why students want to become social entrepreneurs and how to address their motives. Journal of Enterprising Culture, 23(3), 357–380. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218495815500120
  30. Nabi, G., Liñán, F., Fayolle, A., Krueger, N., & Walmsley, A. (2017). The impact of entrepreneurship education in higher education: A systematic review and research agenda. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 16(2), 277-299. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2015.0026
  31. Nambisan, S., Siegel, D., & Kenney, M. (2018). On open digital platforms and entrepreneurship. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 12(3), 354–366. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1300
  32. OECD. (2011). Fostering Innovation to Address Social Challenges. OECD Publishing.
  33. Padilla-Zea, N., Aceto, S., Burgos, D., & Fernández-Manjón, B. (2019). Social seducement: Empowering social economy entrepreneurship. The training approach. International Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Artificial Intelligence, 5(7), 135–150. https://doi.org/10.9781/ijimai.2019.09.001
  34. Peredo, A. M., & Chrisman, J. J. (2006). Toward a theory of community-based enterprise. Academy of Management Review, 31(2), 309-328. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2006.20208683
  35. Perianes-Rodriguez, A., Waltman, L., & van Eck, N. J. (2016). Constructing bibliometric networks: A comparison between full and fractional counting. Journal of Informetrics, 10(4), 1178-1195.
  36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2016.10.006
  37. Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics? Journal of Documentation, 25(4), 348-349.
  38. Ribeiro-Navarrete, B., Saura, J. R., & Simón-Moya, V. (2023). Setting the development of digitalization: State-of-the-art and potential for future research in cooperatives. Review of Managerial Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-023-00663-8
  39. Saz-Gil, I., Bretos, I., & Errasti, A. (2021). Competencias para el emprendimiento social en la universidad: Evaluación y buenas prácticas. Sustainability, 13(2), 534. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020534
  40. Scaringella, L., & Radziwon, A. (2018). Innovation, entrepreneurial, knowledge, and business ecosystems: Old wine in new bottles? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 136, 59-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.09.023
  41. Schaltegger, S., & Wagner, M. (2011). Sustainable entrepreneurship and sustainability innovation: Categories and interactions. Business Strategy and the Environment, 20(4), 222–237. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.682
  42. Shepherd, D. A., & Patzelt, H. (2011). The new field of sustainable entrepreneurship: Studying entrepreneurial action linking “what is to be sustained” with “what is to be developed”. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(1), 137–163. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00426.x
  43. Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265-269. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630240406
  44. Smith, W. K., Gonin, M., & Besharov, M. L. (2013). Managing social–business tensions: A review and research agenda for social enterprise. Business Ethics Quarterly, 23(3), 407–442. https://doi.org/10.5840/beq201323327
  45. Fichter, K., & Tiemann, I. (2018). Factors influencing university support for sustainable entrepreneurship: Insights from explorative case studies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 175, 512–524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.031
  46. Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523-538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
  47. Van Dijk, J. (2020). The digital divide. John Wiley & Sons.
  48. Waltman, L., & van Eck, N. J. (2019). A new methodology for constructing a publication-level classification system of science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(2), 348-362. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20996
  49. Zahra, S. A., Gedajlovic, E., Neubaum, D. O., & Shulman, J. M. (2009). A typology of social entrepreneurs: Motives, search processes and ethical challenges. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(5), 519-532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.04.007
  50. Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429-472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629

Most read articles by the same author(s)