Vol. 1 No. 2 (2025)
Articles

Configurational Theorizing and Multiple Theories in the Pursuit of Theoretical Advancement: A Systematic Review

pdf
  • Cayetano Medina Molina,
  • Noemí Pérez-Macías,
  • Sierra Rey-Tienda
Cayetano Medina Molina
Centro Universitario San Isidoro
Noemí Pérez-Macías
Universidad Pontificia Comillas
Sierra Rey-Tienda
Escuela Universitaria de Osuna (Universidad de Sevilla)
JOINETECH, volume 1, issue 2

Published 2025-12-30

Keywords

  • Theoretical Multiplicity; Configurational Theorizing; Theory Synthesis; Configurational Multiplicity

How to Cite

Configurational Theorizing and Multiple Theories in the Pursuit of Theoretical Advancement: A Systematic Review. (2025). JOINETECH (International Journal of Economic and Technological Studies), 1(2), 21-29. https://doi.org/10.65479/joinetech.11

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Abstract

The objective and significance of the study. The inherent complexity of social phenomena has resulted in a notable increase in the utilization of the configurational approach for their study. Adopting a configurational perspective has consequences for both the development of theories and the analysis of data. In the first case, it involves the use of multiple theories as a means to more comprehensively explain the phenomena under investigation. Secondly, it concerns the implications of integrating different theoretical perspectives into the propositions established within the studies.

The methodology used. In light of the contributions of two publications that have delineated the integration of theoretical multiplicity from a configurational perspective, the present study undertakes a systematic literature review encompassing the period from 2020 to 2025.

Key findings. This study aims to identify the main contributions made by the academic literature in recent years. The identified studies emphasize the efficacy of theoretical multiplicity as a holistic perspective that facilitates the analysis of complex phenomena.

Study limitations. This work has limited the search to Scopus, and can be extended to other repositories as well as different types of work beyond articles.

Practical value of the findings. Furthermore, the potential of QCA as an analytical method is emphasized, as it is predominantly employed in studies that integrate multiple theories into the formulation of their propositions.

pdf

References

  1. Anisimova, T., Billore, S., & Kitchen, P. J. (2023). Ego-depletion is in the way: the challenges of controlled communication and the role of the regulatory focus theory in sustainable goals pursuit. Journal of Communication Management, 28(1), 134-146. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCOM-10-2022-0117
  2. Anton, E., Oesterreich, T.D., & Teuteberg, F. (2022). The property of being causal- The conduct of qualitative comparative analysis in information system research. Information & Management, 59, 103619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2022.103619
  3. Bannor, R.K., & Amponsah, J. (2024). The emergence of food delivery in Africa: A systematic review. Sustainable Technology and Entrepreneurship, 3(2), 100062. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stae.2023.100062
  4. Bley, K., Pappas, I., & Strahringer, S. (2024). A Configurational Approach to Maturity Model Development–Using fsQCA to Build a Multiple-Pathway Maturity Model. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 54(1), 75-132. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.05405
  5. Carrard, N., Kumar, A., Văn, Đ.Đ., Kohlitz, J., Retamal, M., Taron, A., Neemia, N., & Willetts, J. (2024). 8Rs for circular water and sanitation systems: Leveraging circular economy thinking for safe, resilient and inclusive services. Environmental Development, 52, 101093. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2024.101093
  6. Delbridge, R., & Fiss, P.C. (2013). Editors’ comments: Styles of theorizing and the social organization of knowledge. Academy of Management Review, 38(3), 325–331. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2013.0085
  7. Di Paola, N., Chari, S., Iannacci, F., & Kraus, S. (2025). Configurational theory in business and management research: Status quo and guidelines for the application of qualitative comparative analysis (QCA). Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 211, 123907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123907
  8. El Sawy, O.A., Malhotra, A., Park, Y.K., & Pavlov, P.A. (2010). Seeking the Configurations of Digital Ecodynamics: It Takes Three to Tango. Information Systems Research, 21(4), 835-848. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1100.0326
  9. Emans, A., Oolbekkink-Marchand, H., Bakker, C., & De Bruijn, E. (2025). Teacher agency in the dynamics of educational practices: a theory synthesis. Frontiers in Education, 9, 1515123. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1515123
  10. Fallon, A., Jones, R.W., & Keskinen, M. (2022). Bringing resilience-thinking into water governance: Two illustrative case studies from South Africa and Cambodia. Global Environmental Change, 75, 102542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2022.102542
  11. Furnari, S., Crilly, D., Misangyi, V.F., Greckhamer, T., Fiss, P.C., & Aguilera, V. (2021). Capturing causal complexity: heuristics for configurational theorizing. Acad. Manag. Rev., 46(4), 778-799. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2019.0298
  12. Gofen, A., Rønning, R., & Sønderskov, M. (2024). Street-level bureaucracy and Co-creation: towards theory synthesis and cross-fertilization. Public Management Review, 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2024.2429013
  13. Hajiheydari, N., & Delgosha, M.S. (2023). Citizens' support in social mission platforms: Unravelling configurations for participating in civic crowdfunding platforms. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 189, 122366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122366
  14. Harrison, J.S., Ho, V.T., Bosse, D.A., & Crilly, D. (2023). A configurational theory of generalized exchange in stakeholder-oriented firms. Academy of Management Perspectives, 37(1), 16-36. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2022.0034
  15. Hörisch, J., Schaltegger, S., & Freeman, R.E. (2020). Integrating stakeholder theory and sustainability accounting: A conceptual synthesis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 275, 124097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124097
  16. Huang, S., Burton-Jones, A., & Xu, D. (2024). A configurational theory of digital disruption. Inf Syst J, 34, 1737-1786. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12510
  17. Huseynov, F., & Mitchell, J. (2024). Blockchain for environmental peacebuilding: application in water management. DIGITAL POLICY, REGULATION AND GOVERNANCE, 26(1), 55-71. https://doi.org/10.1108/DPRG-06-2023-0080
  18. Iannacci, F., Chari, S., & Papagiannidis, S. (2025a). Investigating successful sustainable urban mobility in large cities: A contingency-based, fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 212, 123963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123963
  19. Iannacci, F., Fearon, C., Kawalek, P., & Simeonova, B. (2023). Aligning the Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) counterfactual approach with the practice of retroduction: Some preliminary insights. Inf Syst J, 33, 467-485. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12409
  20. Iannacci, F., Karanasios, S., Viscusi, G., McManus, R., Rupietta, C., & Tan, C.W. (2025b). Unboxing maturity models: A set-theoretic perspective on e-Government configurations over time. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 34, 101874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2024.101874
  21. Jaakkola, E. (2020). Designing conceptual articles: four approaches. AMS Review, 10, 18-26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13162-020-00161-0
  22. Karpouzoglou, T., Dewulf, A., & Clark, J. (2016). Advancing adaptive governance of social.ecological systems through theoretical multiplicity. Environmental Science & Policy, 57, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.11.011
  23. Ketchen Jr, D.J., Kaufmann, L., & Carter, C.R. (2022). Configurational approaches to theory development in supply chain management: Leveraging underexplored opportunities. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 58(3), 71-88. https://doi.org/10.1111/jscm.12275
  24. Lee, J-N., Park, YK., Straub, D.W., & Koo, Y. (2019). HOLISTIC ARCHETYPES OF IT OUTSOURCING STRATEGY: A CONTINGENCY FIT AND CONFIGURATIONAL APPROACH. MIS Quarterly, 43(4), 1201-1225. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26848101
  25. Li, J., Kim, H., & So, K.K.F. (2024). Understanding psychological ownership in access-based consumption through a theory synthesis: an investigation of Airbnb and hotels. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 33(4), 499-524. https://doi.org/10.1080/19368623.2023.2265352
  26. Lukka, K., & Vinnari, E. (2014). Domain theory and method theory in management accounting research. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 27(8), 1308–1338. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-03-2013-1265
  27. MacInnis, D.J. (2011). A framework for conceptual contributions in marketing. Journal of Marketing, 75(4), 136-154. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.75.4.136
  28. Meier, A., Eller, R., & Peters, M. (2025). Creating competitiveness in incumbent small-and medium-sized enterprises: A revised perspective on digital transformation. Journal of Business Research, 186, 115028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.115028
  29. Mello, P.A. (2021). Qualitative Comparative Analysis. Georgetown University Press.
  30. Mohr, I., Fuxman, L., & Mahmoud, A.B. (2022). A triple-trickle theory for sustainable fashion adoption: the rise of a luxury trend. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 26(4), 640-660. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFMM-03-2021-0060
  31. Nowinska, A., & Solheim, M.C. (2024). Unpacking the influence of foreignness on employment prospects within a multinational enterprise: an examination of gender, professional experience and duration of stay. Journal of Global Mobility: The Home of Expatriate Management Research, 12(2), 288-312. https://doi.org/10.1108/JGM-08-2023-0053
  32. Oana, I.-E., Schneider, C.A., & Thomann, E. (2021). Qualitative Comparative Analysis Using R. A Beginner's Guide. Cambridge University Press.
  33. Park, Y.K., Fiss, P.C., & El Sawy, O.A. (2020). Theorizing the multiplicity of digital phenomena: The ecology of configurations, causal recipes, and guidelines for applying QCA. MIS QUARTERLY, 44(4), 1493-1520. DOI: 10.25300/MISQ/2020/13879
  34. Peters, E., Knight, L., Boersma, K., & Uenk, N. (2023). Organizing for supply chain resilience: a high reliability network perspective. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 43(1), 48-69. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-03-2022-0167
  35. Purmonen, A., Jaakkola, E., & Terho, H. (2023). B2B customer journeys: Conceptualization and an integrative framework. Industrial Marketing Management, 113, 74-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2023.05.020
  36. Ragin, C.C. (2014). The Comparative Method. Moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies. University of California Press.
  37. Riss, U.V., Ziegler, M., & Smith, L.J. (2023). Value dimensions of digital applications and services: the example of voice assistants. International Journal of Web Engineering and Technology, 18(4), 319-343. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJWET.2023.136174
  38. Speldekamp, D., Saka‐Helmhout, A., & Knoben, J. (2020). Reconciling perspectives on clusters: An integrative review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 22(1), 75-98. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12216
  39. Su, Y., & Fan, D. (2022). Smart cities and sustainable development. Regional Studies, 57(4), 722–738. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2022.2106360
  40. Swiatczak, M.D. (2021). Towards a neo-configurational theory of intrinsic motivation. Motivation and Emotion, 45(6), 769-789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-021-09906-1
  41. Termeer, C.J.A.M., & Dewulf, A. (2012). Towards theoretical multiplicity for the governance of transitions: the energy-producing greenhouse case. Int J Sustainable Development, 15(1/2), 37-53. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSD.2012.044033
  42. Thakur-Wernz, P., & Bosse, D. (2023). Configurational framework of learning conduits used by emerging economy firms to improve their innovation performance. Journal of Business Research, 157, 113634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113634
  43. Trischler, J., Røhnebæk, M., Edvardsson, B., & Tronvoll, B. (2023). Advancing public service logic: moving towards an ecosystemic framework for value creation in the public service context. Public Management Review, 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2023.2229836
  44. Van Eetvelde, V., & Christensen, A.A. (2023). Theories in landscape ecology. An overview of theoretical contributions merging spatial, ecological and social logics in the study of cultural landscapes. Landsc Ecol, 38, 4033-4064. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-023-01736-5
  45. Weidig, J., Weippert, M., & Kuehnl, C. (2024). Personalized touchpoints and customer experience: A conceptual synthesis. Journal of Business Research, 177, 144641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114641
  46. Werder, K., & Richter, J. (2022). A meta-analysis on the effects of IT capability toward agility and performance: New directions for information system research. PLOS ONE, 17(10), e0268761. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268761
  47. Woelfl, K., Kaufmann, L., & Carter, C. R. (2023). In the eye of the beholder: A configurational exploration of perceived deceptive supplier behavior in negotiations. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 59(2), 33-61. https://doi.org/10.1111/jscm.12298
  48. Yap, S.F. (2024). Towards a responsible gaming ecosystem: a call to action. Journal of Services Marketing, 38(9), 1132-1150. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSM-05-2024-0222
  49. Zenasni, S., Kuppens, T. E., Vaesen, J., Surmont, J., & Stiers, I. (2024). Conceptualizing Education for Sustainable Development in Urban Secondary Schools. Education and Urban Society, 56(8), 976-1001. https://doi.org/10.1177/00131245241238
  50. Zhang, J. (2024). A configurational analysis of innovation environment and industrial green total factor productivity. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2024.2351421