Vol. 1 No. 2 (2025)
Articles

Perceptions of Generative AI among Higher Education Students: Utility, Risks, Cognitive Impact, and Training Needs

pdf
  • Juan Carlos Asensio Soto
Juan Carlos Asensio Soto
Universidad Europea de Valencia
Bio
JOINETECH, volume 1, issue 2, 2025

Published 2025-12-30

Keywords

  • AI literacy; generative artificial intelligence; higher education; student perceptions; teacher training

Copyright (c) 2025 JOINETECH provides immediate free access to its content, with the conviction that making this information available to the public favors a greater global knowledge exchange. In this sense, the journal follows the DOAJ definition of open access: "We define them as journals in which the copyright holder of a scholarly work grants the rights of use to others using an open licence (Creative Commons or equivalent) that allows immediate free access to the work and permits any user to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search or link to the full text of articles, crawl them for indexing, pass them as data to software or use them for any other lawful purpose. JOINETECH adheres to different initiatives that promote free access to knowledge, such as Plan S of the cOAlition S, or the principles of the communication infrastructure for academic publication and open science AmeliCA, so all JOINETECH contents edited by UTAMED are from free and open access and are published under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0). Likewise, the journal provides information on the conditions of use and reuse of content (Creative Commons and Open Access). That is why the authors who publish in JOINETECH must accept the following conditions: - The authors retain the copyright, assigning to JOINETECH the right of the 1st publication, with the work registered with the Creative Commons attribution license (which allows third parties to use what is published as long as they mention the authorship of the work and the 1st publication in this journal). - Authors can make other independent and additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in JOINETECH (eg, publish it in a book or in an institutional repository) provided that it is clearly indicated that the work was published for the first time in JOINETECH. - Authors are allowed, and even recommended, to publish their work on the Internet (institutional, personal pages, social networks, etc.) since it can facilitate exchanges. - Authors are allowed, and even encouraged, to deposit supplementary material, at least the research data underlying publications, in institutional or thematic open access repositories federated in the European Open Science Cloud (EOSC)."

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

Perceptions of Generative AI among Higher Education Students: Utility, Risks, Cognitive Impact, and Training Needs. (2025). JOINETECH (International Journal of Economic and Technological Studies), 1(2), 91-97. https://doi.org/10.65479/joinetech.25

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Abstract

The massive irruption of generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) has marked an unprecedented turning point in the landscape of higher education. This technological phenomenon poses a structural challenge to traditional pedagogical models, compelling academic institutions to urgently re-evaluate both their teaching methods and assessment criteria. In this context of disruption, it becomes imperative to evaluate its real impact and to delineate a pedagogical response that transcends mere prohibition or unregulated use. The present study is framed within this necessity, adopting as its primary objective to analyze in depth the perception of higher education students in the Social Sciences regarding AI. The study focused on three axes of perception: the practical utility of AI, the identification of ethical and academic risks inherent in its use, and the explicit demand for training to manage this tool.

The methodology employed corresponded to a quantitative design using a five-dimension Likert-type questionnaire covering the constructs of utility, risk, reliability, cognitive impact, and need for training. The collected data were subjected to inferential analysis using the Student's t-test and the Pearson Correlation Coefficient. The results reveal an adoption driven fundamentally by operational efficiency. The most conclusive finding is the demand for faculty training, which underscores a formative gap. The study emphasizes the urgency of a curricular redefinition that equips both students and faculty to manage risks, overcome skepticism about reliability, and utilize AI as a critical and responsible instrument.

pdf

References

  1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211.
  2. Alneyadi, Saif, Wardat, Yousef, Alshannag, Qasim, & Abu-Al-Aish, Ahmad. (2023). The effect of using smart e-learning app on the academic achievement of eighth-grade students. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(4).
  3. Ayanwale, M. A., Sanusi, I. T., Adelana, O. P., Aruleba, K. D., & Oyelere, S. S. (2022). Teachers’ readiness and intention to teach artificial intelligence in schools. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100099
  4. Brown, T. B., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J., Dhariwal, P., & Amodei, D. (2020). Language models are few-shot learners. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33, 1877-1901.
  5. Dwivedi, Y. K., & Al-Banna, H. (2025). Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) for Sustainability: An Exploration of Emerging Academic Discourses. JOINETECH (International Journal of Economic and Technological Studies), 1(01), 1-10.
  6. Gadekallu, T. R., Yenduri, G., Kaluri, R., Rajput, D. S., Lakshmanna, K., Fang, K., ... & Wang, W. (2025). The role of GPT in promoting inclusive higher education for people with various learning disabilities: a review. PeerJ Computer Science, 11.
  7. Gómez, W. O. A. (2023). La inteligencia artificial y su incidencia en la educación: Transformando el aprendizaje para el siglo XXI. Revista internacional de pedagogía e innovación educativa, 3(2), 217-230.
  8. Harry, A. (2023). Role of AI in education. Interdiciplinary Journal & Hummanity (INJURITY), 2(3).
  9. Imran, M., & Almusharraf, N. (2024). Google Gemini as a next generation AI educational tool: a review of emerging educational technology. Smart Learning Environments, 11(1), 22.
  10. Jarrah, Adeeb M., Wardat, Yousef, & Gningue, Serigne. (2022). Misconception on addition and subtraction of fractions in seventh-grade middle school students. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(6),
  11. Kim, K., & Kwon, K. (2023). Exploring the AI competencies of elementary school teachers in South Korea. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, 100137.
  12. Koubaa, A., Boulila, W., Ghouti, L., Alzahem, A., & Latif, S. (2023). Exploring ChatGPT capabilities and limitations: a survey. IEEE Access, 11, 118698–118721. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3326474
  13. Lang, G., Triantoro, T., & Sharp, J. H. (2024). Large language models as AI-powered educational assistants: Comparing GPT-4 and Gemini for writing teaching cases. Journal of Information Systems Education, 35(3), 390-407. https://doi.org/10.62273/YCIJ6454
  14. Lee, G. G., Shi, L., Latif, E., Gao, Y., Bewersdorf, A., Nyaaba, M., et al. (2023). Multimodality of AI for education: Towards artificial general intelligence. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2312.06037
  15. Long, D., & Magerko, B. (2020). What is AI literacy? Competencies and pedagogical considerations. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1-16).
  16. Nguyen, N. D. (2023). Exploring the role of AI in education. London Journal of Social Sciences, (6), 84-95.
  17. Norvig, P. (2021). Artificial intelligence: A modern approach (4th ed.). Pearson Education.
  18. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1-6.
  19. Semenov, A. L. (2023, December). Artificial intelligence in society. In Doklady Mathematics (Vol. 108, No. Suppl 2, pp. S168-S178). Moscow: Pleiades Publishing.
  20. Turing, A. M. (1950). Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind, 59(236), 433-460.
  21. Yeruva, A. R. (2023). Providing A Personalized Healthcare Service To The Patients Using AIOPs Monitoring. Eduvest-Journal of Universal Studies, 3(2), 327–334.
  22. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478.